Article

UK Hospitality - Summer is banked. Winter is the test

The UK hospitality sector had a boost over the summer, but structural challenges remain. We look at what hospitality firms should be doing to build resilience and ensure their financing and capital structure are right for the months ahead.
Contents

A strong summer but structural challenges remain

The UK hospitality sector had a boost over the summer. Good weather, England's run to the World Cup semi-final, which lifted spending across pubs and bars by 16% over the tournament, and the government's confirmation of a 20% cut to business rates bills for pubs, social clubs and live music venues in England from April 2027, have all been good news for the sector.

The question is whether that can be converted into sustainable returns, as the sector still faces significant structural pressures:

Changing consumer behaviour

  • Consumers are still spending, but differently: fewer visits but higher bills.
  • Value and experience are pulling demand to opposite ends of the market, with traditional mid-market operators facing most pressure.
  • Health and lifestyle changes are also affecting demand.

Rising cost base

  • The April 2026 minimum wage increase added around £1.4 billion of cost across the sector, on top of employers' national insurance contributions costing approximately £3.4 billion a year.
  • Restaurant price inflation is running at 4.9% year on year.
  • Energy costs remain a significant issue.

Employment reform

  • The Employment Rights Act 2025 is being phased in from April 2026, introducing a right to guaranteed hours and day-one statutory sick pay.
  • Hospitality is one of the most exposed sectors, employing around 350,000 workers on zero-hours contracts in a model shaped by seasonal and weather-dependent variation in covers. Staffing models will need to change, at higher cost and greater risk to employers.

Tax and Duty

  • The UK applies 20% VAT to food, drink and hotel accommodation alike, the second highest rate for hospitality in Europe. Much of the industry is campaigning for a cut to 10%.
  • Alcohol duty rose again in February 2026.
  • The power for mayors in England to implement overnight visitor levies has been proposed by the government.

A good summer is a temporary lift, not new demand. Some of it is spending customers would otherwise have made later in the year. It does not reset a cost base, and it does not always carry a business through the post-Christmas lull.

Sector argues financial support does not go far enough

The sector has received good news on policy with the government confirming a 20% cut to business rates bills for pubs, social clubs and live music venues in England from April 2027. This sits on top of the 15% relief announced in January for 2026/27 and a real-terms freeze for two further years, and the prime minister has called it a first step.

The cut is welcome, but it is small relative to the problem and narrow in scope. It is expected to save a typical pub an estimated £1,100 next year, and it does not apply to restaurants and hotels, a distinction the sector has publicly challenged on the basis that they compete for the same customers, in the same locations, with the same cost structures. Set against the April 2026 revaluation, the discount is more than absorbed for many operators, and particularly for those running large estates or high-value sites.

Churn across the wider hospitality market underlines the point. In 2025, roughly 15 sites a week were opening but 11 a week were closing, and nearly half of the venues launched that year had failed within 12 months. Rates relief helps at the margin, but the businesses that come through this period will need to have built a genuinely sustainable model.

The cost of staying competitive

Grant Thornton's own research has shown that consumers are prioritising memorable experiences, and the experience economy has been one of the sector's fastest growing segments.

But operators here face their own challenges. Many city centres are at or near capacity, with consumers able to choose between several competing concepts within a short walk. Competition is also coming from outside the sector, with social fitness formats such as padel offering the same shared, competitive occasion. While consumers might play padel weekly, the average visit frequency at a competitive socialising venue is closer to twice a year.

Sustaining demand therefore requires continual reinvestment in games, interiors and technology, with air conditioning becoming close to essential as extreme heat grows more common. Each involves capital expenditure, potential planning consents and trading downtime, straining businesses already managing tight cash headroom. 

The consequences of not investing to stay relevant are visible:

  • Sixes, the cricket-based concept backed by England internationals, fell into administration in December 2025 on the back of poor site selection and fierce competition, before being acquired in May 2026 by a vehicle backed by its secured lenders
  • Axe-throwing operator Whistle Punks ceased trading and went into liquidation in 2025

A focus on cost control and pricing discipline

Creating value can often come down to cost control and pricing discipline: 

  • Procurement: Consolidating purchasing across sites reduces food and beverage cost of goods, and the saving scales with every site added
  • Ancillary revenue opportunities: Vouchers, memberships or corporate packages can often be overlooked, particularly by independent operators, but can provide consistent additional revenue streams
  • Customer loyalty initiatives: Retention programmes matter as winning a new customer is harder than keeping an existing one

For many hospitality businesses, the key question right now is cash, and whether there is enough liquidity to trade through a challenging period.

It is often insufficient working capital, rather than an absence of underlying profitability, that tips otherwise viable businesses into distress.

Rise in CVAs as groups look to right-size the business

Structural cost pressure is leading groups to reset cost bases across their estates. Many are shaped by historical acquisitions and carry sites whose trading performance varies widely. Groups are turning to company voluntary arrangements (CVAs) to reduce costs, agree landlord compromises and put the business on a sustainable footing. Recent examples include:

Turtle Bay

The Caribbean restaurant brand had its CVA approved by around 92% of voting creditors by value in July 2026, closing four sites and varying terms on 15 more. Twenty-nine sites remain unaffected.

Franco Manca
 The pizza chain secured over 90% approval by value in May 2026, covering the closure of 16 of around 70 sites.  
Leon

The natural fast-food chain had its CVA approved unanimously in May 2026, removing a number of underperforming sites and enabling it to exit administration with 43 restaurants, including 23 franchises.

 

How are landlords reacting?

  • Landlords are conceding, but with sharper elbows than in 2020 and 2021, when the pandemic-era wave of retail and casual dining CVAs pushed most of the compromise onto them.
  • The comfortable approval margins seen this year reflect pre-launch negotiation, careful advice and thorough preparation from the business before a proposal is launched.

When to review your financing

For hospitality operators, there are many points at which it is worth testing your financing structure. Any one is reason enough to start a conversation. It is always better to start discussions early before a lender or a covenant test forces the question.

A facility maturing in the next 18 months

Covenant headroom tightening

Pricing and terms out of date

Maturity is when the lender holds the leverage. A process run 12 months ahead of maturity is a choice between several lenders. The same process run six weeks out is a negotiation with one.

Covenant testing that falls in the winter trough can bite even when the full year is sound.

Facilities agreed before recent wage, energy and tax increases may no longer reflect how the business trades, or what the market now offers.

A shareholder or family buy-out

Stakeholder alignment shifts

A capital investment programme

Succession or a partner exit is common in owner-managed groups. Funding it without draining working capital takes careful structuring.

Sentiment can change, or plans progress more slowly than first envisaged, and a party exits. That often refocuses the remaining stakeholders and calls for a change in capital structure.

Refurbishment, new formats, air conditioning and technology cost money and trading downtime. A separate capex facility can protect day-to-day liquidity.

Your bank's appetite has changed

Seasonal or working capital pressure

An acquisition to fund

Internal risk grading tends to move before any payment is missed. A shift in pricing, reporting requests or tone can be an early signal.

Stock and staffing costs build before Christmas, and the January lull follows. A facility sized for an average month can feel tight at both ends.

Adding a site or a small group often needs acquisition funding and changes to the existing facility, ideally handled in one process.

 

What boards should be considering

Start earlier than feels necessary. Early intervention matters, whether the issue is short-term cash flow pressure, refinancing or covenant compliance. The businesses that approach lenders early from a position of preparation rather than pressure are the ones securing the outcomes they want.

Good management information is essential. Our work in the sector has shown that the quality of management information (MI) can vary widely, yet it matters not only for running the business but also securing financing on the best possible terms. It can turn liquidity from a source of anxiety into something a management team can forecast, plan and control. A good financial model and visibility on site-by-site operational performance are key. A borrower that cannot produce reliable, timely figures will struggle to reassure a cautious lender, while one that can sends a clear signal that the business is well run.

What your lender is looking at

Lender type matters because the same proposal can be a straightforward yes for one group and an immediate no for another.

Clearing banks Specialist lenders Private credit
Relationship led, with the cheapest pricing available in exchange for the tightest covenant package. Freehold security and fixed charge cover carry significant weight.
More comfortable with leasehold estates and trading businesses and priced accordingly. Operator track record and site-level performance data count for more here than balance sheet strength alone.
No regulatory capital regime, with returns measured on internal rate of return and/or money multiple. Can support higher leverage, bespoke amortisation and separate capital expenditure tranches where the maths works.

 

How we can help

The pressures facing firms shift the conversation to rethinking how hospitality businesses operate, protect margins and sustain performance. Our debt and capital advisory and restructuring teams work with operators, lenders, landlords and investors across the consumer and hospitality sectors, so the same people can run a refinancing and, if that is not the answer, the options analysis behind it.

The support that tends to be most useful in this sector:

  • Refinancing and new money raises across clearing banks, specialist lenders and private credit
  • Debt advisory on structure, covenant package, capex facilities and pricing
  • Short-term cash flow, liquidity and covenant headroom analysis through the seasonal cycle
  • Options analysis and capital structure review against a revised base case
  • Stakeholder management, including lender-facing reporting, to ensure ongoing support
  • Estate right-sizing, including CVAs, restructuring plans and accelerated M&A

The useful conversations usually start 12 months before anyone thinks they need one.

If any of this is live for your business, or you would like a view on how a lender is likely to read your current numbers, we are happy to talk on a no-obligation basis.