Provision 29: Assurance mapping for material controls
ArticleAssurance mapping gives firms a consolidated view of control activities, helping boards meet Provision 29 requirements in the UK Corporate Governance Code.
13 Jan 20265 min read

Although the use of third parties can bring cost efficiency and operational flexibility, it can also introduce potential vulnerabilities. So how do you manage it? Through a robust third-party risk management programme that identifies, prioritises, and monitors these risks.
Ben Langford and Robert Shaw share common challenges businesses face when managing third-party risk so you can prepare. Plus, find out how The Institute of Internal Auditors recently issued Topical Requirement on Third Parties can help you.
Third-party relationships can expose your organisation to risks that go far beyond operational hiccups. These risks can impact compliance, reputation, and even business continuity. Here are some of the most critical areas to watch:
Identifying risks is only half the battle. To truly protect your organisation, you need to embed risk management throughout the entire third-party lifecycle. Here’s what that looks like:
At a governance level, it’s important to define an approach supported by clear policies and procedures. Roles and responsibilities for working with third parties should be well-defined, along with clarity on who the key stakeholders are across the business. These may include the board, senior management, operations, risk management, HR, IT, finance, legal & compliance, and procurement. Ensuring third parties align with your company’s values and ethics is equally critical.
Risk management processes around third parties should be sufficient to identify, prioritise, mitigate and monitor risk across the third-party life cycle and the full risk universe.
A strong risk management framework starts with asking the right questions. Use these prompts to uncover gaps and prioritise actions:
| Theme | Key questions to ask |
|---|---|
|
Who are your critical third parties?
|
|
|
Governance Gaps – who is in charge?
|
|
|
The Document Deficit – good record keeping is essential
|
|
|
Due Diligence – not just at onboarding
|
|
|
Performance monitoring – required for all critical vendors
|
|
|
Hidden risk in your legal agreements
|
|
|
Sub-outsourcing – the hidden risk |
|
|
Exit planning – for planned and stressed scenarios
|
|
|
The procurement disconnect
|
|
Build a governance framework that enforces accountability and transparency.
If you’d like to have an exploratory conversation or find out more information, contact Ben Langford.
Assurance mapping gives firms a consolidated view of control activities, helping boards meet Provision 29 requirements in the UK Corporate Governance Code.
A practical overview of the FCA’s 2026 wholesale markets priorities, highlighting key risks in financial crime, market abuse and conflicts of interest, and what firms should do to strengthen controls and governance.
Emma Young provides a summary on what organisations need to consider in 2026 to meet provision 29 requirements for the first year reporting.