Article

Learnings from 2025: consumer failures

Philip Stephenson
By:
insight featured image
Contents

Backdrop and the wider picture 

In 2025, UK consumer businesses were squeezed from both ends: inelastic price ceilings on the demand side and structural cost inflation on the supply side. Elevated borrowing costs and persistently high operating costs meant many operators couldn’t pass through costs without losing footfall, balance sheets struggled to refinance at acceptable terms, and working capital headwinds intensified further eroding already thin margins on the high street. 

Against that backdrop, our review of 2025 administrations in the consumer sector (based on administrators’ proposals and SIC mapping) shows 238 administration appointments across retail, hospitality & leisure, and travel & tourism. Of these, 122 were in retail, 81 in hospitality & leisure, and 35 in travel & tourism. Retail saw a sharp increase with administrations rising by more than 37% against 2024 figures. In contrast, travel and tourism experienced a 19% decrease.  

Reasons cited for failure

Please note that the review includes groups with multiple entities in administration; after adjusting for multi-entity group filings, we identify 199 distinct administration processes. Where several group entities failed together, we attribute the reason for administration to the lead entity’s statement.

Echoing 2024, consumer administrations in 2025 were driven by a steady grind of macro pressures including budget uncertainty, persistently weak confidence despite relatively stable disposable incomes, and operating costs that stayed high, leaving margins too thin to absorb further shocks. As cash tightened, refinancing windows narrowed. Mainstream lenders pulled back, and businesses increasingly faced higher capital costs from alternative providers or struggled to find funding.

Year on year comparison

2024 2025 Change
Retail
77
122
58.4%
Hospitality and leisure
81
81
-
Travel and tourism
43
35
(18.6%)
Total consumer administrations
201
238
18.4%
Total administrations
1,597
1,495
(6.4%)
Proportion of consumer administrations
12.6%
15.9%
3.3%

 

Key observations for business failures  

Persistent cost pressures remain a dominant theme 

Across the consumer economy, operating costs remained the most frequently cited trigger of distress. Sticky input inflation and structurally high fixedcost bases continued to erode margins and cash generation. Set against ongoing macro uncertainty and subdued consumer confidence, the sector stayed exposed to the same postpandemic volatility that has characterised recent years. 

  • Across most of the consumer landscape, operating costs continued to outrun pricing power.
  • Business rates continue to track property values, not turnover, intensifying pressure on smaller highstreet operators relative to larger peers in similar premises (see our article on the Autumn 2025 budget here: UK hospitality: Autumn Budget fails to impress | Grant Thornton).
  • Late payments tightened working capital across the supply chain. This has been highlighted in the recent Small Business Strategy report (SBS), published by the Business and Trade Committee on 11 February 2026 (Small business strategy)
  • Legacy rent burdens persist, with operators remaining bound to prepandemic rent levels and inflexible longterm leases misaligned to current footfall.  

Supplier related issues were more common than expected 

Beyond internal cost pressures, a notable proportion of administrations referenced disruption within their supply chains. While seldom the sole cause of failure, supplierside challenges frequently compounded preexisting financial pressure and further reduced the headroom available to management teams. 

Retailers reliant on imports from overseas, particularly from China, were especially exposed to delays, cost volatility, and logistical bottlenecks appearing. Issues in this regard may force higher inventory buffers or tighter supplier credit, pulling cash into working capital at precisely the wrong time. 

A clear need to address early any accumulation of HMRC arrears  

A recurring theme in many cases was the buildup of HMRC liabilities. As these arrears grow, they begin to shape decisionmaking in unhelpful ways, forcing management teams into shortterm fixes rather than forwardlooking planning. 

These dynamics reinforce the case for early engagement on Time to Pay arrangements and proactive strategies to manage tax arrears before they crystallise into critical cashflow challenges.  

The SBR recommended a 25% cut in SME tax administrative costs, citing a figure of c£25 billion being spent per year on tax compliance by small firms alone.  

From an advisory perspective, we continue to help clients engage early with HMRC, structuring workable TTP arrangements, and align tax management with broader liquidity planning.  

Strategic challenges remain prominent

Structural issues within business models featured heavily. In numerous cases, companies were unable to exit either short or longterm lossmaking divisions, contracts, or locations, creating sustained financial drag. Similarly, failed expansion attempts, whether acquisitions, new site rollouts or postmerger integrations regularly led to cost overruns and underperformance, accelerating the path to distress. These findings highlight the need for robust planning around the risks of integration or underperforming in short term trading to ensure that any negative impact on short-to-medium term cashflow is minimised.  

Increased expenditure on security was also mentioned, with retailers spending almost £5.5bn over the past five years (BRC Crime Report 2026). Although there are signs that all this investment is beginning to have an impact, based on news articles and the number of cyber-attacks in 2025, it is likely that this cost will remain high for the near future.  

Loss of key personnel is becoming a notable operational risk 

Some businesses cited the departure of senior personnel with specialist knowledge or critical stakeholder relationships as a material contributing factor to failure. The loss of individuals who hold a key understanding of the industry, or have operational oversight of the Company, can create immediate instability, particularly in already stressed businesses, reinforcing the need for resilient leadership structures and strong financial management capability.  

What does this mean for 2026? 

The 2025 failure patterns underscore a sector contending with rigid cost bases, fragile working capital cycles and shrinking financing options, all set against uneven demand and policy uncertainty. The common thread is insufficient cash headroom leaving businesses vulnerable to relatively modest shocks, whether from supplier friction, rent and rates drag, or the buildup of HMRC arrears. 

As 2026 unfolds, operators that pair disciplined cost control with robust working capital management will be best placed to restore resilience and avoid a slide into distress. Ensuring that underperforming units are addressed and that burdensome leases do not drain cash will be vital. 

If you would like to understand more and hear how we can support you, then please contact Philip Stephenson for further details.