At the same time, the largest wave of Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) in a generation is now underway, with two-tier areas transitioning to new unitary authorities by 2028. This reform aims to eliminate duplication, consolidate leadership structures and improve service delivery. However, it also requires councils to harmonise services, integrate corporate entities and rationalise inherited risks during a period of heightened financial pressure. As elections are postponed in some areas to free up capacity for reorganisation, the expectation is clear: councils must enter the new structure with stable, well governed Alternative Delivery Models (including Local Authority Trading Companies or LATCOs) rather than unresolved issues.
Against this backdrop, councils cannot assume that longstanding ADMs will remain viable without challenges being actively addressed. Many were established in an environment of low interest rates, modest construction inflation and optimistic growth assumptions. Those conditions no longer apply. What Local Authorities need now is a clear view of the practical steps available to safeguard financial sustainability, protect the public purse and maintain delivery of priority services – whilst also building on the successes that have been achieved.
This article focuses on the practical options for addressing the most common causes of distress across LATCOs, drawing on our experiences of working in the sector. The emphasis is on what officers and members can do now to reset structures, strengthen governance and protect value. It is important that these items are addressed before the completion of LGR and the new form of authority has a stable position from which to build.
Our experience shows that emerging distress rarely resolves itself. LATCOs and other ADMs face a set of recurring, predictable risks. Each can be managed through targeted, commercially informed actions.
Many LATCOs have financing arrangements that no longer reflect commercial reality, whether due to leverage levels, misaligned repayment profiles or overreliance on council loans.
These measures are essential to stabilising companies that are fundamentally viable but have inappropriate capital structures.
LATCOs created for regeneration, housing, energy or service delivery outcomes often continue to be focused on delivery targets even when financial metrics are deteriorating.
Delivery and finance must move in tandem. One cannot succeed at the expense of the other.
Weak governance is one of the most consistent findings across public reports into Local Authority failure. LATCO boards often lack the commercial experience required to challenge complex financial and operational risks.
In many cases, councils are absorbing private sector levels of risk without receiving the returns normally required to justify them. It is key that councils remember that LATCOs are stand-alone commercial vehicles and so need to have a risk and reward profile that aligns to these types of structure.
Where risks and returns cannot be aligned, strategic exit or restructuring should be considered.
Forecasting weaknesses are a common thread in failing entities, with common issues including overoptimism, infrequent reforecasting and limited scenario planning.
Robust forecasting gives statutory officers the clarity needed to intervene early.
While not universal, fraud risk increases with scale, complexity, financial distress and weak oversight.
Preventing fraud is dramatically less costly than recovering losses after the fact.
Across the sector, several red flags appear consistently before failure occurs:
These indicators should trigger immediate review, not deferral.
The financial environment facing Local Authorities in 2026 leaves little room for passive stewardship of commercial investments. Yet most LATCO challenges are not new – they are familiar, diagnosable and addressable through practical steps that strengthen financial resilience, improve governance and realign risk and return.
Local Authorities cannot afford to treat LATCO challenges as legacy issues to be tolerated as they navigate through LGR. The choices made now on financing, governance, risk and commercial discipline will determine whether Councils enter the next spending cycle with control or with compounding liabilities. The organisations that act early, intervene confidently and reset failing structures will protect their financial resilience. Those that delay will inherit outcomes, not shape them.
Our team supports stakeholders across the sector in diagnosing risk, reshaping underperforming LATCOs and implementing practical restructuring measures. We are experienced in identifying the root causes of distress and designing interventions that safeguard both financial sustainability and the public purse.
As UKREiiF approaches, explore how aggregation, pragmatic risk allocation and blended funding models can unlock delivery and accelerate viable schemes.
Decarbonising the UK’s energy system and wider economy will require rapid electrification of heat, transport and industry, leading to a sharp rise in electricity demand. The National Energy System Operator’s (NESO) analysis suggests electricity demand could increase by 25-40% by the early 2030s and almost triple by 2050, reaching up to 700-785 TWh per year, compared with around 290 TWh today
Discover how to turn 2025 Budget commitments into real impact for communities. Explore delivery plans, local authority challenges, and practical solutions.
