Pension administration under sharper regulatory scrutiny
ArticleTPR has sharpened expectations for pension scheme administration, highlighting key risks around governance, data integrity and oversight that trustees must act on.
Supply chains and suppliers have been tested and found vulnerable over recent years as a result of unavoidable changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions, and high energy costs. Cyber-attacks are also an ever-present risk, with severe consequences for corporates, governments, and financial institutions.
Many organisations have poor visibility of supply-chain risks and understanding of relevant processes and controls operated by their key suppliers.
According to the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) 2022 survey, only 13% of businesses reviewed the risks posed by their immediate suppliers, and only 7% of businesses reviewed wider supply-chain risks.
To meet the growing need to understand and manage supply chain risks, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has developed a protocol for entities who want to increase transparency on how they're managing their supply-chain risk. The protocol includes guidance and a voluntary supply chain reporting framework: SOC for Supply Chain.
The SOC for Supply Chain reporting framework is focused on helping an organisation, its suppliers, customers, and business partners to evaluate and establish a supply chain-risk management programme, as they're responsible for identifying, evaluating, and addressing risks associated with it. The framework adopts a similar approach to existing SOC 1 and SOC 2 examinations, ensuring that the testing requirements, report format, and contents are robust, well established, and recognised in the market.
SOC for Supply Chain can be used by organisations of any size, in any industry, but some entities will see greater benefits:
Organisations are looking for visibility across supply-chain networks to better understand the risks of doing business with suppliers both from a fraud and stability/quality basis. Putting controls in place is therefore necessary to mitigate risk.
Often organisations rely on manual, time-consuming third party risk assessments, or tailored audits addressing the supply chain risks. A SOC for Supply Chain examination can reduce vendor due diligence efforts as part of onboarding exercise, to a great extent by:
Businesses are also exposed to bribery, human rights, and environmental risks in their supply chain which adversely impact their brand and global reputation. SOC for supply chain enables identification and assessment of ESG risks throughout the entire supply chain. This is especially relevant for industries such as agriculture, food, fashion, timber production, and mining, which are often vulnerable to these risks. Your organisation will be able to understand components that make up ESG compliance requirements and see tasks and their responsible people clearly, having clarity as to where to get information throughout your supply chain.
SOC for supply chain description criteria (DC300) aims to create a common framework for developing and reporting their supply chain risk management efforts, which will be used by an auditor in providing an opinion in the SOC report. The 10 description criteria listed in SOC for supply chain are below:
It's important to produce a quality SOC report using a mature and robust framework to help respond effectively to stakeholder requirements. However, understanding issues that may arise when delivering your report is key for effectiveness and efficiency and ensuring it can be shared with multiple owners.
For more insight and guidance, get in touch with Tim Foster-Key or Eddie Best.
![]()
TPR has sharpened expectations for pension scheme administration, highlighting key risks around governance, data integrity and oversight that trustees must act on.
UK crypto regulation is accelerating as the FCA issues new consultations. Learn what firms must do to prepare for authorisation under the incoming regime.
Boards are increasingly being called upon to take ownership of technology risk oversight as a strategic imperative, reinforced by the updated UK Corporate Governance Code and the new Cyber Governance Code of Practice. In 2026, staying ahead of technology risks and regulatory shifts isn’t optional - it’s essential. Are you clear on where to focus to keep your organisation in control?
Get the latest insights, events and guidance, straight to your inbox.