Offshore non-compliance: Don't ignore nudge letters
ArticleHMRC continues to focus on tackling offshore non-compliance. Louisa Beciri explores its increased focus in this area, and the action taxpayers and their professional advisors can take.

Over the past few years, cryptoassets have moved from the fringes of financial activity into everyday investment portfolios. With an estimated seven million UK adults now holding crypto, the scale of this shift has materially reshaped HMRC’s compliance priorities. What began as light‑touch guidance has evolved into a sophisticated regime supported by enhanced reporting obligations, targeted nudge campaigns and, critically, growing access to domestic and international data.
This acceleration has caught many taxpayers off guard. A significant number have historic gains they never realised were taxable, income from staking or mining that has never been reported, or disposal events embedded within swaps and transfers they did not recognise as chargeable. As HMRC continues to refine its cryptoasset manual, introduce dedicated Self-Assessment sections and issue escalating waves of communications, the risks of inaction have risen sharply.
At the same time, HMRC’s dedicated Cryptoasset Disclosure Facility provides a formal route for individuals to correct past errors even before the tax authority contacts them. However, the process demands careful preparation, full transparency and a deep understanding of HMRC expectations, particularly as officers increasingly challenge both the accuracy of crypto calculators and the behavioural assumptions underpinning penalty calculations.
HMRC has escalated its compliance interventions at pace. Around 65,000 crypto tax nudge letters were issued in the tax year ending April 2025, more than double the previous year supported by email campaigns and targeted advertising. These communications are intended to prompt taxpayers to review their historic position and regularise any errors.
Importantly, HMRC’s scrutiny now extends beyond Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Recent activity includes sending letters regarding cryptoassets appearing in Inheritance Tax (IHT) returns, signaling that personal representatives, solicitors and other advisers must be alert to crypto holdings across a broader set of tax considerations.
Despite extensive outreach, early results from the disclosure facility show tax receipts of little more than £4 million; a figure HMRC expects to grow significantly as its access to data expands. If taxpayers ignore nudges or fail to correct historic errors, escalation is highly likely, including higher penalties and potential enquiries.
HMRC classifies cryptoassets as property rather than currency. This means Capital Gains Tax (CGT) generally applies when assets are sold, swapped, gifted, or used to purchase goods or services. With reductions to the annual exemption and increases to CGT rates, more taxpayers are now within scope, and their liabilities are higher.
Income Tax applies where crypto is ‘earned’, such as through mining, staking rewards or certain airdrops. While it is possible for taxpayers to carry on a trade in relation tocryptoassets, this will only apply to a small minority, and in such rare cases, income tax would apply.
A significant recent development is the inclusion of a dedicated cryptoasset section in the self-assessment return from the 2024/25 tax year. Although seemingly minor, this structural change dramatically improves HMRC’s ability to profile non‑compliance and target taxpayers whose reported activity appears inconsistent with other data sources.
With the rapid expansion of data sources, HMRC’s capabilities have grown. Crypto exchanges already share information with HMRC, and this will increase substantially under the new global Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF). From 1 January 2026, UK‑registered service providers must now supply customer identity information and transaction histories, with the first reports due by May 2027. Over 50 jurisdictions will participate in data exchange.
This influx of detailed, standardised international data will allow HMRC to cross‑match submissions, self-assessment returns, and exchange‑reported activity at scale; significantly strengthening the accuracy and reach of future compliance activity.
HMRC’s Cryptoasset Disclosure Facility offers individuals a structured way to come forward with historic errors. It covers unpaid IT and CGT from activities such as disposals, rewards, airdrops and crypto‑for‑crypto exchanges. Failure to disclose can result in higher penalties, more interest and, in rare cases, criminal investigation.
Before beginning the disclosure, HMRC requires taxpayers to gather extensive information, including transaction volumes, acquisition costs, disposal details and platform data. In practice, this often means using both a cryptoasset calculator and a specialist adviser, as HMRC increasingly challenges anomalies, requires walkthroughs and tests the completeness of underlying records.
Although taxpayers can file personally, determining the correct number of years to disclose is key. HMRC officers are becoming more assertive in their assumptions about taxpayer behaviour, which has a direct impact on lookback periods and penalty levels. Robust representation is therefore essential.
Acting before HMRC makes contact could reduce penalties, stop interest accruing, and remove the uncertainty associated with potential enquiry.
HMRC expects taxpayers to take corrective action now. Getting crypto taxation right requires precision, strategic judgement and an understanding of how HMRC interprets behaviour and intent. We support clients across every stage of the process by:
If you believe you may have historic crypto tax exposures or want to understand how HMRC’s expanding capabilities might affect you, get in touch with David Francis and Jonathan Hair.
HMRC continues to focus on tackling offshore non-compliance. Louisa Beciri explores its increased focus in this area, and the action taxpayers and their professional advisors can take.
HMRC has recently stepped up its focus on ESS-related fraud. What does this mean for implicated traders?
HMRC issues clarification on draft transfer pricing rules.