Are you viewing the amendments to FRS 102 as a compliance headache – or a springboard for lasting improvements across your finance function?  Pinkesh Patel, Head of Financial Reporting, shares how to develop a robust conversion plan that delivers both control and strategic value. 

Contents

Step one: Understand the business impact

Before diving into the technicalities of the amendments to FRS 102, I recommend taking a step back to establish a robust conversion project plan. It should cover all affected areas and stakeholders across your business, rather than focusing solely on the finance function.
 
This will allow you to:

  • prioritise actions effectively, ensuring critical tasks receive timely attention and nothing falls through the cracks.
  • clarify how individual activities are interdependent, helping you to spot where delays or complications in one area may impact progress elsewhere.
  • more easily identify where extra resource or specialist input is needed, whether in-house or from external advisers.

The first step to preparing this conversion project plan is to understand what the updates mean for your business. The changes will have the most impact on earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), but they will create waves far beyond the debts and credits.

If you haven’t explored all of these areas yet, you’re in good company. Our April 2026 survey of 500+ UK CFOs shows many are still only part way through assessing the full breadth of the amendments. Only 3% tell us they have already assessed every area.

FRS 102 impact areas UK CFOs say they have not yet assessed:

At a high-level, the impacts span six areas:

  • Debt covenants based on EBITDA or interest cover
  • Earn-out calculations due to be paid post 1 January 2026
  • Employee incentive schemes based on EBITDA
  • Delivery and pricing structure of long-term revenue contracts
  • Budgeting and forecasting systems and approach
  • Intercompany trading balances and transfer pricing
As part of this impact assessment, management should also consider how first‑year transition and presentation decisions may influence stakeholder interpretation of performance in the year of adoption. How this is communicated will be key, from internal teams to regulators to lenders.

Step two: FRS 102 conversion impact assessment

Once you are clear on which parts of your business will be most impacted, the next step is to assess your current readiness with a conversion impact assessment. 

Use the checklist below to understand where you are in the process and identify outstanding actions to prioritise:

Confirm if additional resources are required, and agree roles and responsibilities
Identify and engage with key stakeholders
Understand training needs of finance team and wider stakeholders
Identify all leases in scope and gather relevant data
Understand revenue streams and contract population for each
Update budget and forecasts, and amend processes for business-as-usual
Perform a disclosure dry run and obtain early audit feedback ahead of first reporting period
Engage with external auditor to confirm requirements and additional audit work required
Update financial reporting processes and controls based on conversion work performed
Consider wider business impact through discussions with stakeholders
Confirm system requirements and areas of improvement
Prepare conversion technical papers (including quantification, disclosures and policies)
Agree transition approach, treatment of comparatives and first year presentation with auditors
Map all revenue streams to the five step revenue recognition model and identify areas requiring judgement
Identify embedded leases within customer and supplier contracts, and document the review process
Define lease term assumptions (including renewal and break options) and document key judgements
Assess whether systems can support revised lease and revenue disclosures and future digital filing requirements
Document key accounting judgements, including discount rate methodology and revenue timing conclusions
Perform pro forma covenant and earn out calculations using revised EBITDA and net debt
Engage lenders and relevant counterparties early where metrics are impacted
Embed revenue recognition checkpoints into contract approval and billing processes
"Experience has shown us two recurring pitfalls. Teams often begin the conversion too late, resulting in audit delays, higher fees, and potential covenant breaches. Secondly, we consistently see communication fall short. If EBITDA or P&L are impacted, your Board will want to know earlier rather than later.”
Pinkesh Patel Partner, CFO Solutions

Step three: Identify opportunities to add value

The checklist above should cover the fundamentals. If you can check them off, you will have led a well-managed, compliant transition. But a robust project plan should aim to do more than just ‘remain compliant’.

The FRS 102 amendments also offer an opportunity to sharpen your finance function’s system capabilities and processes.

Reflect on:

  • Are your forecasting and management information truly giving you what you need to drive decisions?
  • Could you make better use of lease accounting software or other automation tools streamline the process and free up your team’s time for more value-add activities, and less manual reconciliations?
  • Are there any opportunities to simplify or align accounting treatments across entities for greater consistency and insight?

Having approached the amendments through this broader business lens, you can factor changes directly into your conversion project plan; embedding improvements that deliver long-term efficiency, not just compliance.

For businesses scaling through acquisitions, this is also a key point in time to proactively strengthen group governance, ensuring consistent application of accounting policies across entities and addressing challenges in integrating newly acquired entities with limited lease data to avoid future audit friction.

Manage the transition effectively

A robust project plan is the foundation for a successful transition under the first year of the FRS 102 amendments. By actively engaging all stakeholders throughout the journey - from sales teams to procurement to your external auditors, you build alignment, foster transparency, and minimise the risk of unwelcome surprises at the finish line.

While no plan can predict every twist and turn, a well-structured approach will ensure you have the space to adapt, respond proactively, and keep your objectives on track, even when the unexpected arises.

Clear ownership for post‑implementation reviews, judgement updates and future compliance should also be agreed before go‑live, so FRS 102 doesn’t become a one‑off project but a sustainable, repeatable process. 

Ready to implement?

FRS 102 toolkits

See how our FRS 102 implementation toolkits – including templates and detailed guidance – support your team from impact assessment to implementation.