Roundtable: Stability Through Change
ReportOur HE Roundtable discussion brought together audit committee chairs to explore how universities can strengthen financial stability.

Are you viewing the amendments to FRS 102 as a compliance headache – or a springboard for lasting improvements across your finance function? Pinkesh Patel, Head of Financial Reporting, shares how to develop a robust conversion plan that delivers both control and strategic value.
Before diving into the technicalities of the amendments to FRS 102, I recommend taking a step back to establish a robust conversion project plan. It should cover all affected areas and stakeholders across your business, rather than focusing solely on the finance function.
This will allow you to:
The first step to preparing this conversion project plan is to understand what the updates mean for your business. The changes will have the most impact on earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), but they will create waves far beyond the debts and credits.
If you haven’t explored all of these areas yet, you’re in good company. Our April 2026 survey of 500+ UK CFOs shows many are still only part way through assessing the full breadth of the amendments. Only 3% tell us they have already assessed every area.
At a high-level, the impacts span six areas:
Once you are clear on which parts of your business will be most impacted, the next step is to assess your current readiness with a conversion impact assessment.
Use the checklist below to understand where you are in the process and identify outstanding actions to prioritise:
|
✔
|
Confirm if additional resources are required, and agree roles and responsibilities
|
|
✔
|
Identify and engage with key stakeholders
|
|
✔
|
Understand training needs of finance team and wider stakeholders
|
|
✔
|
Identify all leases in scope and gather relevant data
|
|
✔
|
Understand revenue streams and contract population for each
|
|
✔
|
Update budget and forecasts, and amend processes for business-as-usual
|
|
✔
|
Perform a disclosure dry run and obtain early audit feedback ahead of first reporting period
|
|
✔
|
Engage with external auditor to confirm requirements and additional audit work required
|
|
✔
|
Update financial reporting processes and controls based on conversion work performed
|
|
✔
|
Consider wider business impact through discussions with stakeholders
|
|
✔
|
Confirm system requirements and areas of improvement
|
|
✔
|
Prepare conversion technical papers (including quantification, disclosures and policies)
|
|
✔
|
Agree transition approach, treatment of comparatives and first year presentation with auditors
|
|
✔
|
Map all revenue streams to the five step revenue recognition model and identify areas requiring judgement
|
|
✔
|
Identify embedded leases within customer and supplier contracts, and document the review process
|
|
✔
|
Define lease term assumptions (including renewal and break options) and document key judgements
|
|
✔
|
Assess whether systems can support revised lease and revenue disclosures and future digital filing requirements
|
|
✔
|
Document key accounting judgements, including discount rate methodology and revenue timing conclusions
|
|
✔
|
Perform pro forma covenant and earn out calculations using revised EBITDA and net debt
|
|
✔
|
Engage lenders and relevant counterparties early where metrics are impacted
|
|
✔
|
Embed revenue recognition checkpoints into contract approval and billing processes
|

The checklist above should cover the fundamentals. If you can check them off, you will have led a well-managed, compliant transition. But a robust project plan should aim to do more than just ‘remain compliant’.
The FRS 102 amendments also offer an opportunity to sharpen your finance function’s system capabilities and processes.
Reflect on:
Having approached the amendments through this broader business lens, you can factor changes directly into your conversion project plan; embedding improvements that deliver long-term efficiency, not just compliance.
For businesses scaling through acquisitions, this is also a key point in time to proactively strengthen group governance, ensuring consistent application of accounting policies across entities and addressing challenges in integrating newly acquired entities with limited lease data to avoid future audit friction.
A robust project plan is the foundation for a successful transition under the first year of the FRS 102 amendments. By actively engaging all stakeholders throughout the journey - from sales teams to procurement to your external auditors, you build alignment, foster transparency, and minimise the risk of unwelcome surprises at the finish line.
While no plan can predict every twist and turn, a well-structured approach will ensure you have the space to adapt, respond proactively, and keep your objectives on track, even when the unexpected arises.
Clear ownership for post‑implementation reviews, judgement updates and future compliance should also be agreed before go‑live, so FRS 102 doesn’t become a one‑off project but a sustainable, repeatable process.

See how our FRS 102 implementation toolkits – including templates and detailed guidance – support your team from impact assessment to implementation.
Our HE Roundtable discussion brought together audit committee chairs to explore how universities can strengthen financial stability.
Discover how FRS 102 updates impact leases in Construction, revenue, and reporting. Learn key challenges and steps to stay compliant and ahead.
Pressure points and action plans from our South and Midlands finance leader discussions to help you navigate FRS 102 updates in 2026.